Partly Cloudy
71°
Morris, IL
Partly Cloudy|Forecast »

Illinois police chiefs group president under investigation over helicopter program

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 3)

“I was in the ‘hot seat’ so to speak — being ganged up on by the previous mayor, administrator and finance director,” he wrote.

The town’s attorney, Randy Vickery, said Countryside officials could not comment because of the pending investigation, but the city gave the Tribune hundreds of records under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

Four months after Swanson’s memo, he retired at age 50 and immediately took a $68,000-a-year job with the Kankakee County Sheriff’s Office as its chief of municipal policing.

With the state and federal government’s blessing, Swanson moved his helicopter program to Kankakee County, basing it out of the Rotors and Wings hangar.

But controversy soon arose over how he left Countryside.

A 2010 Tribune investigation showed how Countryside had given retiring officers a one-time $850 bonus that, through creative math, dramatically boosted retirement checks. In Swanson’s case, his one-time bonus boosted his annual pension by 20 percent, to nearly $85,000.

By 2010, records show, the mayor and aldermen were digging deeper into Swanson’s program, from his nonprofit’s tax records to Kaiser’s past and partnerships with Swanson to checks Swanson had written from the drug-seizure fund.

They asked one of their attorneys, Nick Cetwinski, to seek an outside police investigation.

Cetwinski was Countryside’s labor attorney and had advised that spiking officers’ pensions appeared legal. He also was a longtime friend of Swanson’s, doing legal work for the chief on the side and eventually for Swanson’s new department in Momence, records show.

By the middle of 2010, Countryside leaders began to question Cetwinski’s role in both issues. The suburb hired another law firm, Freeborn & Peters, which pushed an internal investigation that led to the city suing Cetwinski for malpractice in 2011.

The suburb alleged that Cetwinski should have known the pension spikes were illegal as well as caught “extensive wrongdoing” from Swanson that cost the town “significant” money.

Cetwinski’s attorneys countered in court filings that he gave the best advice he could and did all he was asked to do to investigate Swanson.

To try to prove its case against Cetwinski, the suburb subpoenaed records from the former chief, but his attorney refused to provide them, citing ongoing criminal investigations. “He (Swanson) will not participate in any legal proceedings and will continue to exercise his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination,” his attorney Dirksen wrote.

Comments


Reader Poll

Were you impacted by last week's flooding?

Yes, but only inconvenienced by closed streets
Yes, water got close, but everything worked out OK
Yes, I had to evacuate my home or workplace
Yes, my house sustained extensive damage
No, I managed to avoid it all