Partly Cloudy
62°
Morris, IL
Partly Cloudy|Forecast »

Ex-Penn State president charged in Jerry Sandusky case

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 2)

But during Thursday's news conference, Kelly said the three men had discussed “in great detail” incidents in 1998 and 2001 involving Sandusky, including a now-infamous shower assault witnessed by former graduate assistant coach Mike McQueary.

“The investigation has established that all three administrators were informed of both of these incidents and had knowledge of Sandusky's assaults as early as the 1998 incident,” Kelly said.

Sandusky, 68, was convicted in June of 45 counts related to the sexual abuse of children, including seven counts stemming from the 1998 and 2001 incidents Spanier, Curley and Schultz are charged with concealing. He was sentenced last month to 30 to 60 years behind bars, which he will serve at the state prison in Greene County, which houses most of Pennsylvania's death row inmates.

The actions taken by Spanier, Schultz and Curley in the wake of those incidents made up the bulk of a report by former FBI Director Louis Freeh that concluded the administrators and Paterno concealed Sandusky's crimes from university trustees and continued to give him access to school facilities.

Spanier's lawyers have called the Freeh report a myth and said he would have acted in 1998, 2001 or any time if he knew a predator like Sandusky was on campus.

Kelly said investigators benefited from that file and from an “extensive amount” of additional information from Penn State that was released after Spanier was fired.

On Thursday, Noonan was corrosive in his criticism of the three men.

Reading over the grand jury presentment against them “you'll see concerns expressed by these three men: concerns for themselves, concerns for the university and even concerns for Jerry Sandusky… the one thing you will find lacking is any concern for the victims.”

|||3|Next Page

Comments


Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion