Fair
68°
Morris, IL
Fair|Forecast »

Board mulls lowering pay for driver ed

Current rate mirrors summer school pay, 50 percent higher than top rate at other schools

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 1)

Board member Jim Paulson pointed out it wasn't a percentage raise given, but a rate increase for summer school hours that was part of the bargaining agreement.

Meucci said at the finance committee meeting last week that she did feel $45 was too high, but that she was more concerned with the process by which the rate was determined. Meucci was not on the board when the current contract was approved.

"I understand this is what you did in the past, but the board is supposed to pass non-contractual salaries yearly," she said then.

Meucci said some of the new board members were unaware this was in the contract, and that non-contractual pay needs to be voted on annually so the taxpayers know how their money is being spent.

She asked Monday if the vote on the $30 recommendation could wait until after executive session. Halloran said yes, or it could be tabled until next month. The board voted to table it.

The use of non-contractual teachers for some behind-the-wheel instruction began in the early 2000s, under Superintendent Steve Fannin, said Halloran. In the mid-2000s, the district had a couple of teachers who did driver's education retire, as well as a couple leave the district. In addition, the driving permit laws changed requiring students to have their permits longer, so more summertime instruction was needed.

At that time, they used more non-contractual instructors to avoid hiring two full-time teachers, which saved the district about $100,000, Halloran said.

||2|Next Page

Comments

Total Comments
11

View/Add Comments

Most Recent Comment

REDSKINSFAN wrote on February 15, 2013 1:44 p.m. ...
Exactly nthsidereader, All the info they want is there or easily retrievable but that is not what they want.. They want to muddy the picture and cast doubt hoping nobody calls them on it. Well, I hope eveyone continues to call them on it and calls the board on it, otherwise I fear where we're heading... The call was made to correct the rate of pay for BTW drivers but Muecci wants more fact, why? More grandstanding!? She has the fact and comparisons to other schools but elected to hold off, why? Accept the fact that the BOARD messed up, fix it, and move on. Easy, but doesn't help their cause.

Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion