Mostly Cloudy
70°
Morris, IL
Mostly Cloudy|Forecast »

The cut is in the mail

If you need someone to blame for USPS’ woes, blame Nixon

  Comments (...)
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 1)

It’s not their fault the Postal Service is unable to adapt to modern times — unable to find ways to sell new products and services to post offices’ nearly 1 billion annual visitors.

Most postal employees are crushed under the weight of outmoded business processes and bureaucratic inanities. They lack the organizational support to serve customers as well as they would like. They are unable to help their employer grow and thrive.

But here is the real problem postal workers face: Because the Postal Service is technically an independent entity, the federal government won’t extend it billions in printed money to cover its budget shortfalls — as our government does with every other government organization.

If only the Postal Service were still a full government organization, it wouldn’t have a worry in the world — for the moment, anyhow.

Consider: Our government’s annual deficit has been in the $1 trillion range for five years running. What’s another $15.9 billion? All we’d have to do is print another $15.9 billion to cover the Postal Service’s shortfall.

Actually, we’d only have to print another $10.4 billion. Because if the Postal Service were fully a government organization, nobody in Congress would make it put aside $5.5 billion a year to fund the needs of future retirees.

There’s a lot of finger-pointing going on to explain the Postal Service’s budget woes. I say blame it all on Nixon.

———

Tom Purcell is a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review humor columnist and is nationally syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. Email Tom at Purcell@caglecartoons.com.

||2|Next Page

Comments

Total Comments
0

View/Add Comments

There have been no comments made about this story.

Reader Poll

What is your stance on a proposed 1 percent sales tax to fund local school building projects?

I'm in favor of anything that will help improve school finances
I will support it if it helps to lower my property taxes
I oppose it because I don't believe it will impact property taxes and I will just pay twice
I'm against any additional taxes
I have not heard enough yet to form an opinion